Porticor vs SecuPi
Porticor vs SecuPi, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Porticor is on 39/100 and SecuPi on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Porticor
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SecuPi
- our overall score: 51/100 against 39/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 19/100
- funding raised: $40.0M against $7.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Porticor | SecuPi |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Porticor provided cloud security solutions, including data encryption and key management, for enterprises migrating to public and private cloud environments. | SecuPi provides data-centric security solutions for real-time monitoring, behavior analytics, and protection across applications and big data. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Data Encryption | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Data Protection, Data Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Porticor | SecuPi |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 70 |
| Total funding | $7.0M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 2,493 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Porticor | SecuPi |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 34/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Porticor | SecuPi |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
What users say
| Measure | Porticor | SecuPi |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“I'm asking because it seems that some of the main players are not supporting full MySQL DB encryption anymore (e.g. Porticor, Safenet, etc.) and AWS RDS + KMS does not support multi-REGION failover since the KMS is locked per region.”r/security
Porticor vs SecuPi: common questions
Which is better, Porticor or SecuPi?
On our 0-100 score SecuPi rates higher (51/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Porticor and SecuPi compare on the numbers?
SecuPi leads on our overall score (51/100 against 39/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100), domain rating (58/100 against 19/100), funding raised ($40.0M against $7.0M).
What do real users say about Porticor and SecuPi?
Porticor: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/security.
Read the full Porticor review and pricing or the SecuPi review and pricing. You can also browse other Porticor alternatives we track.