Poolhouse Technologies vs SensorTower
Poolhouse Technologies vs SensorTower, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Poolhouse Technologies is on 45/100 and SensorTower on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Poolhouse Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SensorTower
- our overall score: 60/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 445 against 68
- funding raised: $145M against $55.0M
- LinkedIn following: 70,910 against 6,268
At a glance
| Measure | Poolhouse Technologies | SensorTower |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | POOLHOUSE is the advertising agency trusted by the toughest campaigns and biggest causes in America. Sharp strategy. Bold creative. Proven results. | Digital intelligence platform for mobile app analytics, advertising, and audience behavior. |
| Category | AdTech, Political Advertising, Campaign Strategy, Creative Services | AdTech, Business Intelligence, Competitive Intelligence, Digital Advertising |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Washington, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Poolhouse Technologies | SensorTower |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 68 | 445 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +16.9% |
| Total funding | $55.0M | $145M |
| Latest round | Growth | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,268 | 70,910 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Poolhouse Technologies | SensorTower |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 45/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 20/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Poolhouse Technologies | SensorTower |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
Poolhouse Technologies vs SensorTower: common questions
Which is better, Poolhouse Technologies or SensorTower?
On our 0-100 score SensorTower rates higher (60/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Poolhouse Technologies and SensorTower compare on the numbers?
SensorTower leads on our overall score (60/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 39/100), domain rating (83/100 against 20/100), headcount (445 against 68), funding raised ($145M against $55.0M), LinkedIn following (70,910 against 6,268).
Read the full Poolhouse Technologies review and pricing or the SensorTower review and pricing. You can also browse other Poolhouse Technologies alternatives we track.