Polygon vs StarkWare
Polygon vs StarkWare, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Polygon is on 81/100 and StarkWare on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Polygon
- our overall score: 81/100 against 73/100
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 71/100
- headcount: 389 against 194
- funding raised: $400M against $180M
- LinkedIn following: 209,060 against 20,607
StarkWare
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Polygon | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A framework and platform for building and connecting blockchain networks, focusing on scalability and usability for Ethereum. | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. |
| Category | Blockchain, Web3, DeFi, Scalability | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Mumbai, India | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Polygon | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 389 | 194 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +15.6% |
| Total funding | $400M | $180M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| Valuation | $10B | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 209,060 | 20,607 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Polygon | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 81/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 5/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Polygon | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Walletconnect |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Polygon vs StarkWare: common questions
Which is better, Polygon or StarkWare?
On our 0-100 score Polygon rates higher (81/100 against 73/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Polygon and StarkWare compare on the numbers?
Polygon leads on our overall score (81/100 against 73/100), agent readiness (43/100 against 30/100), domain rating (83/100 against 71/100), headcount (389 against 194), funding raised ($400M against $180M), LinkedIn following (209,060 against 20,607).
Read the full Polygon review and pricing or the StarkWare review and pricing. You can also browse other Polygon alternatives we track.