Polygon vs QuickNode
Polygon vs QuickNode, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Polygon is on 81/100 and QuickNode on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Polygon
- our overall score: 81/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 389 against 122
- funding raised: $400M against $95.0M
QuickNode
- agent readiness: 77/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Polygon | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A framework and platform for building and connecting blockchain networks, focusing on scalability and usability for Ethereum. | Blockchain infrastructure provider offering high-performance RPC nodes and developer tools for Web3 applications. |
| Category | Blockchain, Web3, DeFi, Scalability | Blockchain, Web3, SaaS, Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Mumbai, India | Miami, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Polygon | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 389 | 122 |
| Total funding | $400M | $95.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $10B | $800M |
| LinkedIn followers | 209,060 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Polygon | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 81/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 5/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | B (77/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Polygon | QuickNode |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Not detected | Stripe |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Segment |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot, Discourse |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | X402 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Polygon vs QuickNode: common questions
Which is better, Polygon or QuickNode?
On our 0-100 score Polygon rates higher (81/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Polygon and QuickNode compare on the numbers?
Polygon leads on our overall score (81/100 against 62/100), headcount (389 against 122), funding raised ($400M against $95.0M). QuickNode leads on agent readiness (77/100 against 43/100).
Read the full Polygon review and pricing or the QuickNode review and pricing. You can also browse other Polygon alternatives we track.