Planck vs Underwrite.ai
Planck vs Underwrite.ai, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Planck is on 65/100 and Underwrite.ai on 40/100.
Where each one leads
Planck
- our overall score: 65/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 44/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 75 against 1
- LinkedIn following: 6,433 against 204
Underwrite.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Planck | Underwrite.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Commercial insurance data platform enabling instant and accurate business underwriting. | AI-powered platform for underwriting and risk assessment in financial services. |
| Category | Fintech, Insurance, Underwriting, InsurTech | Fintech, InsurTech, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance, Risk Assessment |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Planck | Underwrite.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 75 | 1 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -7.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $71.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $250M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,433 | 204 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Planck | Underwrite.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 34/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 18/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Planck | Underwrite.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Planck vs Underwrite.ai: common questions
Which is better, Planck or Underwrite.ai?
On our 0-100 score Planck rates higher (65/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Planck and Underwrite.ai compare on the numbers?
Planck leads on our overall score (65/100 against 40/100), domain rating (44/100 against 32/100), headcount (75 against 1), LinkedIn following (6,433 against 204).
Read the full Planck review and pricing or the Underwrite.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Planck alternatives we track.