PlainID vs Token Security
PlainID vs Token Security, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: PlainID is on 63/100 and Token Security on 56/100.
Where each one leads
PlainID
- our overall score: 63/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 93 against 50
- funding raised: $88.0M against $27.0M
- LinkedIn following: 23,482 against 5,575
Token Security
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 39/100
At a glance
| Measure | PlainID | Token Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise authorization platform for data, APIs, and AI, powered by Policy Based Access Control (PBAC). | Secures cloud environments by protecting human and non-human identities with a machine-first approach. |
| Category | Enterprise, Authorization, Identity Management, Identity & Access | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Identity Management, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | PlainID | Token Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 93 | 50 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +87.0% |
| Total funding | $88.0M | $27.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $300M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 23,482 | 5,575 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | PlainID | Token Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | PlainID | Token Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Reddit Pixel |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
PlainID vs Token Security: common questions
Which is better, PlainID or Token Security?
On our 0-100 score PlainID rates higher (63/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do PlainID and Token Security compare on the numbers?
PlainID leads on our overall score (63/100 against 56/100), headcount (93 against 50), funding raised ($88.0M against $27.0M), LinkedIn following (23,482 against 5,575). Token Security leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 39/100).
Read the full PlainID review and pricing or the Token Security review and pricing. You can also browse other PlainID alternatives we track.