Placer.ai vs Whole Foods
Placer.ai vs Whole Foods, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Placer.ai is on 76/100 and Whole Foods on 25/100.
Where each one leads
Placer.ai
- our overall score: 76/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 36/100
- funding raised: $241M against $78.4M
Whole Foods
- domain rating: 85/100 against 74/100
At a glance
| Measure | Placer.ai | Whole Foods |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Placer.ai is a location analytics platform that provides foot traffic data and consumer behavior insights for retailers, commercial real estate, and other businesses. | A leading American supermarket chain focused on natural and organic foods. |
| Category | Retail, GPS, Location Intelligence, Government | Retail, Grocery, Natural Foods, Organic Foods |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Marketplace |
| Founded | 2014 | 1980 |
| Headquarters | Los Altos, United States | Austin, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Placer.ai | Whole Foods |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 634 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $241M | $78.4M |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 49,119 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Placer.ai | Whole Foods |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 25/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 66/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 85/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Placer.ai | Whole Foods |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Placer.ai vs Whole Foods: common questions
Which is better, Placer.ai or Whole Foods?
On our 0-100 score Placer.ai rates higher (76/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Placer.ai and Whole Foods compare on the numbers?
Placer.ai leads on our overall score (76/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 36/100), funding raised ($241M against $78.4M). Whole Foods leads on domain rating (85/100 against 74/100).
Read the full Placer.ai review and pricing or the Whole Foods review and pricing. You can also browse other Placer.ai alternatives we track.