Placer.ai vs Travo
Placer.ai vs Travo, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Placer.ai is on 76/100 and Travo on 42/100.
Where each one leads
Placer.ai
- our overall score: 76/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 11/100
- headcount: 634 against 4
Travo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Placer.ai | Travo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Placer.ai is a location analytics platform that provides foot traffic data and consumer behavior insights for retailers, commercial real estate, and other businesses. | We use AI to collect and analyze real estate data |
| Category | Retail, GPS, Location Intelligence, Government | Artificial Intelligence, Real Estate, Proptech, Real Estate Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Los Altos, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Placer.ai | Travo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 634 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $241M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 49,119 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Placer.ai | Travo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 42/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 7/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 66/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 11/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Placer.ai | Travo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Placer.ai vs Travo: common questions
Which is better, Placer.ai or Travo?
On our 0-100 score Placer.ai rates higher (76/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Placer.ai and Travo compare on the numbers?
Placer.ai leads on our overall score (76/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 25/100), domain rating (74/100 against 11/100), headcount (634 against 4).
Read the full Placer.ai review and pricing or the Travo review and pricing. You can also browse other Placer.ai alternatives we track.