Placer.ai vs Return Signals
Placer.ai vs Return Signals, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Placer.ai is on 76/100 and Return Signals on 36/100.
Where each one leads
Placer.ai
- our overall score: 76/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 634 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 49,119 against 386
Return Signals
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Placer.ai | Return Signals |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Placer.ai is a location analytics platform that provides foot traffic data and consumer behavior insights for retailers, commercial real estate, and other businesses. | AI luxury concierge for E-commerce brands |
| Category | Retail, GPS, Location Intelligence, Government | Generative AI, E-commerce, SMS, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2014 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Los Altos, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Placer.ai | Return Signals |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 634 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +1.8% | Not published |
| Total funding | $241M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 49,119 | 386 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Placer.ai | Return Signals |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 36/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 80/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 66/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Placer.ai | Return Signals |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, PostHog |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Placer.ai vs Return Signals: common questions
Which is better, Placer.ai or Return Signals?
On our 0-100 score Placer.ai rates higher (76/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Placer.ai and Return Signals compare on the numbers?
Placer.ai leads on our overall score (76/100 against 36/100), domain rating (74/100 against 10/100), headcount (634 against 2), LinkedIn following (49,119 against 386).
Read the full Placer.ai review and pricing or the Return Signals review and pricing. You can also browse other Placer.ai alternatives we track.