Pixellot vs Track160
Pixellot vs Track160, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Pixellot is on 62/100 and Track160 on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Pixellot
- our overall score: 62/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 170 against 34
- funding raised: $231M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 27,079 against 3,875
Track160
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Pixellot | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated sports production solutions for capturing, producing, and distributing live and on-demand sports content. | Automated FIFA EPTS certified football data analytics platform for clubs and leagues. |
| Category | Sports, Media, Sports Tech, Automated Production | Sports, Analytics, Video, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Petah Tikva, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Pixellot | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 170 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -34.4% | -29.6% |
| Total funding | $231M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Debt | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,079 | 3,875 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Pixellot | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Pixellot | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Pixellot | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“My son is going to a baseball tournament, and Pixellot is offered as a streaming service. The deal is you pay $99 and Pixellot will video tape all the games during the tournament week. Has anyone tried Pixellot? The offer also includes indi”r/baseball
Pixellot vs Track160: common questions
Which is better, Pixellot or Track160?
On our 0-100 score Pixellot rates higher (62/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Pixellot and Track160 compare on the numbers?
Pixellot leads on our overall score (62/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 21/100), domain rating (58/100 against 27/100), headcount (170 against 34), funding raised ($231M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (27,079 against 3,875).
What do real users say about Pixellot and Track160?
Pixellot: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/baseball.
Read the full Pixellot review and pricing or the Track160 review and pricing. You can also browse other Pixellot alternatives we track.