Pintu vs Pluang
Pintu vs Pluang, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Pintu is on 59/100 and Pluang on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Pintu
- our overall score: 59/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 81/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 967 against 293
- funding raised: $156M against $93.0M
Pluang
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 47/100
- LinkedIn following: 54,007 against 14,209
At a glance
| Measure | Pintu | Pluang |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A licensed Indonesian crypto exchange offering a user-friendly mobile app for trading digital assets. | A financial technology platform developing mobile applications for investing. |
| Category | Fintech, Web3, Crypto Exchange, Digital Payments | Not published |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Jakarta, Indonesia | Jakarta, Indonesia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Pintu | Pluang |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 967 | 293 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $156M | $93.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,209 | 54,007 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Pintu | Pluang |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Pintu | Pluang |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
Pintu vs Pluang: common questions
Which is better, Pintu or Pluang?
On our 0-100 score Pintu rates higher (59/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Pintu and Pluang compare on the numbers?
Pintu leads on our overall score (59/100 against 55/100), domain rating (81/100 against 63/100), headcount (967 against 293), funding raised ($156M against $93.0M). Pluang leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 47/100), LinkedIn following (54,007 against 14,209).
Read the full Pintu review and pricing or the Pluang review and pricing. You can also browse other Pintu alternatives we track.