Ping Identity vs Secret Double Octopus
Ping Identity vs Secret Double Octopus, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ping Identity is on 60/100 and Secret Double Octopus on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Ping Identity
- our overall score: 60/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 2,370 against 35
- funding raised: $111M against $22.5M
- LinkedIn following: 160,033 against 6,130
Secret Double Octopus
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Ping Identity | Secret Double Octopus |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provider of identity security solutions for the digital enterprise. | Enterprise cybersecurity startup focused on identity and access management using advanced cryptography. |
| Category | Identity & Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity, Identity & Access Management, Authentication | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Identity & Access Management, Authentication |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Denver, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ping Identity | Secret Double Octopus |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,370 | 35 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +21.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $111M | $22.5M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 160,033 | 6,130 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ping Identity | Secret Double Octopus |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ping Identity | Secret Double Octopus |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Ping Identity vs Secret Double Octopus: common questions
Which is better, Ping Identity or Secret Double Octopus?
On our 0-100 score Ping Identity rates higher (60/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ping Identity and Secret Double Octopus compare on the numbers?
Ping Identity leads on our overall score (60/100 against 48/100), headcount (2,370 against 35), funding raised ($111M against $22.5M), LinkedIn following (160,033 against 6,130).
Read the full Ping Identity review and pricing or the Secret Double Octopus review and pricing. You can also browse other Ping Identity alternatives we track.