Pinecone vs Responsive
Pinecone vs Responsive, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Pinecone is on 66/100 and Responsive on 35/100.
Where each one leads
Pinecone
- our overall score: 66/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 76/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 127 against 8
- LinkedIn following: 77,036 against 1,027
Responsive
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Pinecone | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Managed vector database for building scalable, reliable, and accurate AI applications and search. | Platform for developers building stateful reactive applications on the modern cloud with object store native databases. |
| Category | AI Infrastructure, API Platform, Artificial Intelligence, Data | Enterprise, Development, Data, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Pinecone | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 127 | 8 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +29.1% |
| Total funding | $138M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $750M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 77,036 | 1,027 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Pinecone | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 35/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 10/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | B (76/100) | F (27/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Pinecone | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Pinecone vs Responsive: common questions
Which is better, Pinecone or Responsive?
On our 0-100 score Pinecone rates higher (66/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Pinecone and Responsive compare on the numbers?
Pinecone leads on our overall score (66/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (76/100 against 27/100), domain rating (80/100 against 29/100), headcount (127 against 8), LinkedIn following (77,036 against 1,027).
Read the full Pinecone review and pricing or the Responsive review and pricing. You can also browse other Pinecone alternatives we track.