Pibit.AI vs SensorTower
Pibit.AI vs SensorTower, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Pibit.AI is on 47/100 and SensorTower on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Pibit.AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SensorTower
- our overall score: 60/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 445 against 148
- funding raised: $145M against $1.5M
- LinkedIn following: 70,910 against 25,308
At a glance
| Measure | Pibit.AI | SensorTower |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Pibit.ai turns submissions into decisions with CURE™, using agentic underwriting to raise win rate, throughput, and lower loss ratios. | Digital intelligence platform for mobile app analytics, advertising, and audience behavior. |
| Category | AdTech, MarTech, AI-Driven Advertising, Marketing Automation | AdTech, Business Intelligence, Competitive Intelligence, Digital Advertising |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Pibit.AI | SensorTower |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 148 | 445 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +16.9% |
| Total funding | $1.5M | $145M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 25,308 | 70,910 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Pibit.AI | SensorTower |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Pibit.AI | SensorTower |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Pibit.AI vs SensorTower: common questions
Which is better, Pibit.AI or SensorTower?
On our 0-100 score SensorTower rates higher (60/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Pibit.AI and SensorTower compare on the numbers?
SensorTower leads on our overall score (60/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 46/100), domain rating (83/100 against 27/100), headcount (445 against 148), funding raised ($145M against $1.5M), LinkedIn following (70,910 against 25,308).
Read the full Pibit.AI review and pricing or the SensorTower review and pricing. You can also browse other Pibit.AI alternatives we track.