Phreesia vs Tebra Managed Billing
Phreesia vs Tebra Managed Billing, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Phreesia is on 61/100 and Tebra Managed Billing on 22/100.
Where each one leads
Phreesia
- our overall score: 61/100 against 22/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 1,532 against 1,069
Tebra Managed Billing
- domain rating: 85/100 against 71/100
- LinkedIn following: 131,512 against 68,147
At a glance
| Measure | Phreesia | Tebra Managed Billing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A healthcare software platform automating patient check-in, scheduling, payments, and administrative tasks. | Tebra provides a comprehensive practice automation platform for healthcare providers, offering solutions for patient engagement, practice management, and electronic health records. |
| Category | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Healthcare Software | HealthTech, MedTech, Practice Management Software, Electronic Health Records |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2005 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Newport Beach, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Phreesia | Tebra Managed Billing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,532 | 1,069 |
| Total funding | $120M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 68,147 | 131,512 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Phreesia | Tebra Managed Billing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 22/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 85/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Phreesia | Tebra Managed Billing |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Phreesia vs Tebra Managed Billing: common questions
Which is better, Phreesia or Tebra Managed Billing?
On our 0-100 score Phreesia rates higher (61/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Phreesia and Tebra Managed Billing compare on the numbers?
Phreesia leads on our overall score (61/100 against 22/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 43/100), headcount (1,532 against 1,069). Tebra Managed Billing leads on domain rating (85/100 against 71/100), LinkedIn following (131,512 against 68,147).
Read the full Phreesia review and pricing or the Tebra Managed Billing review and pricing. You can also browse other Phreesia alternatives we track.