Phreesia vs Relatient
Phreesia vs Relatient, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Phreesia is on 61/100 and Relatient on 6/100.
Where each one leads
Phreesia
- our overall score: 61/100 against 6/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 62/100
Relatient
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Phreesia | Relatient |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A healthcare software platform automating patient check-in, scheduling, payments, and administrative tasks. | A patient engagement platform for healthcare organizations focused on self-scheduling and patient communication. |
| Category | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Healthcare Software | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Scheduling Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B SaaS | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | Not published |
| Founded | 2005 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Nashville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Phreesia | Relatient |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,532 | Not published |
| Total funding | $120M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 68,147 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Phreesia | Relatient |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 6/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Phreesia | Relatient |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Phreesia vs Relatient: common questions
Which is better, Phreesia or Relatient?
On our 0-100 score Phreesia rates higher (61/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Phreesia and Relatient compare on the numbers?
Phreesia leads on our overall score (61/100 against 6/100), domain rating (71/100 against 62/100).
Read the full Phreesia review and pricing or the Relatient review and pricing. You can also browse other Phreesia alternatives we track.