Phlo vs Virta
Phlo vs Virta, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Phlo is on 54/100 and Virta on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Phlo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Virta
- our overall score: 66/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 903 against 105
- funding raised: $235M against $23.4M
- LinkedIn following: 69,315 against 5,606
At a glance
| Measure | Phlo | Virta |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A digital healthtech provider offering a comprehensive ecosystem of pharmacy and healthcare services. | Reversing type 2 diabetes and other chronic metabolic diseases through personalized nutrition and remote care. |
| Category | HealthTech, Digital Pharmacy, E-commerce, API Platform | HealthTech, Digital Health, Telemedicine, Chronic Disease Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | services | platform | Software | services |
| Founded | 2019 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Glasgow, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Phlo | Virta |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 105 | 903 |
| Total funding | $23.4M | $235M |
| Latest round | Series A1 | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,606 | 69,315 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Phlo | Virta |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 34/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Phlo | Virta |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude |
| Support stack | Intercom | Zendesk, HubSpot |
Phlo vs Virta: common questions
Which is better, Phlo or Virta?
On our 0-100 score Virta rates higher (66/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Phlo and Virta compare on the numbers?
Virta leads on our overall score (66/100 against 54/100), domain rating (72/100 against 34/100), headcount (903 against 105), funding raised ($235M against $23.4M), LinkedIn following (69,315 against 5,606).
Read the full Phlo review and pricing or the Virta review and pricing. You can also browse other Phlo alternatives we track.