Phish.ai vs Proofpoint
Phish.ai vs Proofpoint, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Phish.ai is on 19/100 and Proofpoint on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Phish.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Proofpoint
- our overall score: 52/100 against 19/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 8/100
- headcount: 4,000 against 2
At a glance
| Measure | Phish.ai | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time, zero-day phishing prevention using cloud-native AI and computer vision. | Cybersecurity firm focused on protecting people, data, and AI-driven workflows. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security | Cybersecurity, Software, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Sunnyvale, USA |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Phish.ai | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 4,000 |
| Total funding | Not published | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Phish.ai | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 19/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 5/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 8/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Phish.ai | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
What users say
| Measure | Phish.ai | Proofpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Harnessing the power of Phish.AI, PhishTank, Google Big Query and Google Data Studio to analyze Phishing Trends.”r/bigquery
Phish.ai vs Proofpoint: common questions
Which is better, Phish.ai or Proofpoint?
On our 0-100 score Proofpoint rates higher (52/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Phish.ai and Proofpoint compare on the numbers?
Proofpoint leads on our overall score (52/100 against 19/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 42/100), domain rating (91/100 against 8/100), headcount (4,000 against 2).
What do real users say about Phish.ai and Proofpoint?
Phish.ai: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/bigquery.
Read the full Phish.ai review and pricing or the Proofpoint review and pricing. You can also browse other Phish.ai alternatives we track.