PHIL vs Press Ganey and Forsta
PHIL vs Press Ganey and Forsta, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: PHIL is on 64/100 and Press Ganey and Forsta on 50/100.
Where each one leads
PHIL
- our overall score: 64/100 against 50/100
Press Ganey and Forsta
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 4,591 against 279
- funding raised: $236M against $103M
- LinkedIn following: 110,846 against 30,316
At a glance
| Measure | PHIL | Press Ganey and Forsta |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enabling pharmaceutical companies to deliver medications directly to patients at scale. | Experience management and research technology platform leveraging AI for insights and action. |
| Category | HealthTech, Pharmaceuticals, Logistics, Fintech | Experience Management, Customer Experience (CX), Employee Experience (EX), Patient Experience (PX) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 1985 |
| Headquarters | Scottsdale, USA | South Bend, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | PHIL | Press Ganey and Forsta |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 279 | 4,591 |
| Total funding | $103M | $236M |
| Latest round | Growth Debt | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 30,316 | 110,846 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | PHIL | Press Ganey and Forsta |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 100/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 81/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | PHIL | Press Ganey and Forsta |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Self Managed |
| CDN | Netlify | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
PHIL vs Press Ganey and Forsta: common questions
Which is better, PHIL or Press Ganey and Forsta?
On our 0-100 score PHIL rates higher (64/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do PHIL and Press Ganey and Forsta compare on the numbers?
PHIL leads on our overall score (64/100 against 50/100). Press Ganey and Forsta leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 41/100), domain rating (75/100 against 44/100), headcount (4,591 against 279), funding raised ($236M against $103M), LinkedIn following (110,846 against 30,316).
Read the full PHIL review and pricing or the Press Ganey and Forsta review and pricing. You can also browse other PHIL alternatives we track.