Phasecraft vs QEDMA
Phasecraft vs QEDMA, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Phasecraft is on 57/100 and QEDMA on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Phasecraft
- funding raised: $99.4M against $40.7M
QEDMA
- domain rating: 52/100 against 44/100
At a glance
| Measure | Phasecraft | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quantum computing software company developing tools for fault-tolerant quantum computers. | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Software, Foundation Model, AI Infrastructure | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Phasecraft | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +31.2% |
| Open roles | Not published | 4 |
| Total funding | $99.4M | $40.7M |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5,017 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Phasecraft | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Phasecraft | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Phasecraft vs QEDMA: common questions
Which is better, Phasecraft or QEDMA?
On our 0-100 score Phasecraft rates higher (57/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Phasecraft and QEDMA compare on the numbers?
Phasecraft leads on funding raised ($99.4M against $40.7M). QEDMA leads on domain rating (52/100 against 44/100).
Read the full Phasecraft review and pricing or the QEDMA review and pricing. You can also browse other Phasecraft alternatives we track.