Perpetual Next vs Stormfisher
Perpetual Next vs Stormfisher, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Perpetual Next is on 57/100 and Stormfisher on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Perpetual Next
- domain rating: 38/100 against 34/100
- funding raised: $675M against $430M
Stormfisher
- our overall score: 62/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 53 against 42
- LinkedIn following: 9,514 against 4,614
At a glance
| Measure | Perpetual Next | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A climate tech company enabling industries to produce more sustainably by reusing organic waste. | Develops, owns, and operates industrial-scale facilities producing green hydrogen derived e-Fuels. |
| Category | Not published | Climate Tech, Clean Energy, Green Hydrogen, Hydrogen |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2017 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Gorinchem, Netherlands | London, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Perpetual Next | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 42 | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +46.9% |
| Total funding | $675M | $430M |
| Latest round | Series B | PE Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,614 | 9,514 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Perpetual Next | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Perpetual Next | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Perpetual Next vs Stormfisher: common questions
Which is better, Perpetual Next or Stormfisher?
On our 0-100 score Stormfisher rates higher (62/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Perpetual Next and Stormfisher compare on the numbers?
Perpetual Next leads on domain rating (38/100 against 34/100), funding raised ($675M against $430M). Stormfisher leads on our overall score (62/100 against 57/100), headcount (53 against 42), LinkedIn following (9,514 against 4,614).
Read the full Perpetual Next review and pricing or the Stormfisher review and pricing. You can also browse other Perpetual Next alternatives we track.