PerkinElmer vs Thermo Fisher Scientific
PerkinElmer vs Thermo Fisher Scientific, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: PerkinElmer is on 6/100 and Thermo Fisher Scientific on 78/100.
Where each one leads
PerkinElmer
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 22/100
Thermo Fisher Scientific
- our overall score: 78/100 against 6/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 75/100
At a glance
| Measure | PerkinElmer | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in life sciences and diagnostics, providing instruments, reagents, and services. | Global leader in serving science, providing analytical instruments, consumables, and services for research, diagnostics, and manufacturing. |
| Category | Life Sciences, Diagnostics, Biotech, MedTech | Life Sciences, Analytical Instruments, Laboratory Equipment, Biotechnology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, software, services | Platform |
| Founded | 1937 | 1956 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, United States | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | PerkinElmer | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 100,104 |
| Total funding | Not published | $5.5B |
| Latest round | Not published | Debt |
| Valuation | Not published | $220B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 2,298,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | PerkinElmer | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 6/100 | 78/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | PerkinElmer | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
PerkinElmer vs Thermo Fisher Scientific: common questions
Which is better, PerkinElmer or Thermo Fisher Scientific?
On our 0-100 score Thermo Fisher Scientific rates higher (78/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do PerkinElmer and Thermo Fisher Scientific compare on the numbers?
PerkinElmer leads on agent readiness (31/100 against 22/100). Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on our overall score (78/100 against 6/100), domain rating (86/100 against 75/100).
Read the full PerkinElmer review and pricing or the Thermo Fisher Scientific review and pricing. You can also browse other PerkinElmer alternatives we track.