Perimeter 81 vs Twingate
Perimeter 81 vs Twingate, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Perimeter 81 is on 69/100 and Twingate on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Perimeter 81
- our overall score: 69/100 against 61/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 73/100
- funding raised: $155M against $62.0M
- LinkedIn following: 33,562 against 6,806
Twingate
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 50/100
At a glance
| Measure | Perimeter 81 | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Converged networking and cybersecurity platform for secure remote and office access to all resources. | Twingate provides a Zero Trust Network Access solution that replaces traditional VPNs for secure remote access. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Network, Network Security | Cybersecurity, Zero Trust, Network Access, Remote Access |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Redwood City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Perimeter 81 | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 97 | 84 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -26.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $155M | $62.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.0B | $400M |
| LinkedIn followers | 33,562 | 6,806 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Perimeter 81 | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Perimeter 81 | Twingate |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Framer |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Perimeter 81 vs Twingate: common questions
Which is better, Perimeter 81 or Twingate?
On our 0-100 score Perimeter 81 rates higher (69/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Perimeter 81 and Twingate compare on the numbers?
Perimeter 81 leads on our overall score (69/100 against 61/100), domain rating (90/100 against 73/100), funding raised ($155M against $62.0M), LinkedIn following (33,562 against 6,806). Twingate leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 50/100).
Read the full Perimeter 81 review and pricing or the Twingate review and pricing. You can also browse other Perimeter 81 alternatives we track.