Peer39 vs Relegence
Peer39 vs Relegence, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Peer39 is on 48/100 and Relegence on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Peer39
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 2/100
- funding raised: $20.0M against $11.0M
Relegence
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Peer39 | Relegence |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops semantic advertising technology for precise ad-to-content matching using NLP and ML. | Relegence provides semantic technologies for contextual targeting, content curation, and business intelligence, leveraging taxonomy, NLP, and machine learning. |
| Category | Marketing, Real-Time Bidding, AdTech, MarTech | Marketing, Advanced Targeting, Semantic Technology, Contextual Targeting |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2005 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Peer39 | Relegence |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 61 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $11.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,855 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Peer39 | Relegence |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Peer39 | Relegence |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight, Tiktok Pixel, Reddit Pixel | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Peer39 vs Relegence: common questions
Which is better, Peer39 or Relegence?
On our 0-100 score Peer39 rates higher (48/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Peer39 and Relegence compare on the numbers?
Peer39 leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 21/100), domain rating (60/100 against 2/100), funding raised ($20.0M against $11.0M).
Read the full Peer39 review and pricing or the Relegence review and pricing. You can also browse other Peer39 alternatives we track.