Pentera vs Sweet Security
Pentera vs Sweet Security, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Pentera is on 68/100 and Sweet Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Pentera
- our overall score: 68/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 487 against 119
- funding raised: $175M against $128M
- LinkedIn following: 93,381 against 8,963
Sweet Security
- headcount growth: +126.9% against +14.1%
At a glance
| Measure | Pentera | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated security validation platform to continuously test and reduce cyber exposure. | Cloud runtime security suite defending cloud workloads with offensive and defensive expertise. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Penetration Testing, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, AppSec |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Pentera | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 487 | 119 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.1% | +126.9% |
| Total funding | $175M | $128M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 93,381 | 8,963 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Pentera | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 79/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Pentera | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Pentera vs Sweet Security: common questions
Which is better, Pentera or Sweet Security?
On our 0-100 score Pentera rates higher (68/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Pentera and Sweet Security compare on the numbers?
Pentera leads on our overall score (68/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 39/100), domain rating (69/100 against 47/100), headcount (487 against 119), funding raised ($175M against $128M), LinkedIn following (93,381 against 8,963). Sweet Security leads on headcount growth (+126.9% against +14.1%).
Read the full Pentera review and pricing or the Sweet Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Pentera alternatives we track.