PayPal vs TransferMate Global Payments
PayPal vs TransferMate Global Payments, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: PayPal is on 77/100 and TransferMate Global Payments on 63/100.
Where each one leads
PayPal
- our overall score: 77/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 95/100 against 68/100
- headcount: 36,810 against 416
- funding raised: $9.9B against $91.0M
- LinkedIn following: 1,680,583 against 52,079
TransferMate Global Payments
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | PayPal | TransferMate Global Payments |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global leader in digital payments, enabling individuals and businesses to send, receive, and manage money online. | Global payment infrastructure enabling embedded payments for businesses and partners. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Payments, Embedded Finance, International Payments |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform | services |
| Founded | 1998 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Kilkenny, Ireland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | PayPal | TransferMate Global Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 36,810 | 416 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -22.9% |
| Total funding | $9.9B | $91.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,680,583 | 52,079 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | PayPal | TransferMate Global Payments |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 58/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 90/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 95/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | PayPal | TransferMate Global Payments |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Payments | PayPal | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
PayPal vs TransferMate Global Payments: common questions
Which is better, PayPal or TransferMate Global Payments?
On our 0-100 score PayPal rates higher (77/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do PayPal and TransferMate Global Payments compare on the numbers?
PayPal leads on our overall score (77/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 40/100), domain rating (95/100 against 68/100), headcount (36,810 against 416), funding raised ($9.9B against $91.0M), LinkedIn following (1,680,583 against 52,079).
Read the full PayPal review and pricing or the TransferMate Global Payments review and pricing. You can also browse other PayPal alternatives we track.