Payhawk vs Reap
Payhawk vs Reap, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Payhawk is on 61/100 and Reap on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Payhawk
- our overall score: 61/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 459 against 264
- funding raised: $81.0M against $45.0M
- LinkedIn following: 77,638 against 36,811
Reap
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Payhawk | Reap |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | All-in-one spend management platform for businesses, simplifying expenses, cards, and payments. | A corporate payment solutions platform for businesses to manage and optimize their spending. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Corporate Cards, Expense Management | Fintech, Payments, Corporate Cards, Expense Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Hong Kong, Hong Kong |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Payhawk | Reap |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 459 | 264 |
| Total funding | $81.0M | $45.0M |
| Latest round | Bridge | Series A |
| Valuation | $575M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 77,638 | 36,811 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Payhawk | Reap |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Payhawk | Reap |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
Payhawk vs Reap: common questions
Which is better, Payhawk or Reap?
On our 0-100 score Payhawk rates higher (61/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Payhawk and Reap compare on the numbers?
Payhawk leads on our overall score (61/100 against 57/100), domain rating (66/100 against 55/100), headcount (459 against 264), funding raised ($81.0M against $45.0M), LinkedIn following (77,638 against 36,811).
Read the full Payhawk review and pricing or the Reap review and pricing. You can also browse other Payhawk alternatives we track.