Passave vs Ping Identity
Passave vs Ping Identity, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Passave is on 16/100 and Ping Identity on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Passave
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Ping Identity
- our overall score: 60/100 against 16/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 2/100
At a glance
| Measure | Passave | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Passave offers a platform for secure and efficient management of digital assets and credentials. | Provider of identity security solutions for the digital enterprise. |
| Category | Identity Management, Digital Identity, Credential Management, Cybersecurity | Identity & Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity, Identity & Access Management, Authentication |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2001 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Denver, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Passave | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 2,370 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +21.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $111M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 160,033 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Passave | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 16/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 2/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Passave | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Passave vs Ping Identity: common questions
Which is better, Passave or Ping Identity?
On our 0-100 score Ping Identity rates higher (60/100 against 16/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Passave and Ping Identity compare on the numbers?
Ping Identity leads on our overall score (60/100 against 16/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 31/100), domain rating (82/100 against 2/100).
Read the full Passave review and pricing or the Ping Identity review and pricing. You can also browse other Passave alternatives we track.