Parathon vs Phreesia
Parathon vs Phreesia, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Parathon is on 22/100 and Phreesia on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Parathon
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Phreesia
- our overall score: 61/100 against 22/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 18/100
- headcount: 1,532 against 81
- LinkedIn following: 68,147 against 13,549
At a glance
| Measure | Parathon | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Streamlines insurance eligibility and benefits verification for healthcare providers and payers. | A healthcare software platform automating patient check-in, scheduling, payments, and administrative tasks. |
| Category | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Insurance, Benefits Verification | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Healthcare Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Austin, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Parathon | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 81 | 1,532 |
| Total funding | Not published | $120M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,549 | 68,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Parathon | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 22/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 19/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 18/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Parathon | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Parathon vs Phreesia: common questions
Which is better, Parathon or Phreesia?
On our 0-100 score Phreesia rates higher (61/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Parathon and Phreesia compare on the numbers?
Phreesia leads on our overall score (61/100 against 22/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 44/100), domain rating (71/100 against 18/100), headcount (1,532 against 81), LinkedIn following (68,147 against 13,549).
Read the full Parathon review and pricing or the Phreesia review and pricing. You can also browse other Parathon alternatives we track.