Paragraf vs Quantum Machines
Paragraf vs Quantum Machines, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Paragraf is on 33/100 and Quantum Machines on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Paragraf
- agent readiness: 32/100 against 25/100
Quantum Machines
- our overall score: 68/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 54/100 against 44/100
- funding raised: $293M against $82.6M
At a glance
| Measure | Paragraf | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Paragraf is a pioneer in graphene-based electronic devices, developing advanced sensors and quantum computing components. | Builds the Quantum Orchestration Platform (QOP) to accelerate quantum computing development and deployment. |
| Category | Graphene, Semiconductor, Sensor Technology, Magnetic Sensors | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Software, AI Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Paragraf | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 302 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +27.4% |
| Total funding | $82.6M | $293M |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $350 | $700M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 31,433 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Paragraf | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 33/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Paragraf | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Paragraf vs Quantum Machines: common questions
Which is better, Paragraf or Quantum Machines?
On our 0-100 score Quantum Machines rates higher (68/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Paragraf and Quantum Machines compare on the numbers?
Paragraf leads on agent readiness (32/100 against 25/100). Quantum Machines leads on our overall score (68/100 against 33/100), domain rating (54/100 against 44/100), funding raised ($293M against $82.6M).
Read the full Paragraf review and pricing or the Quantum Machines review and pricing. You can also browse other Paragraf alternatives we track.