Panzura vs Wasabi Technologies
Panzura vs Wasabi Technologies, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Panzura is on 54/100 and Wasabi Technologies on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Panzura
- our overall score: 54/100 against 47/100
Wasabi Technologies
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 300 against 205
- funding raised: $250M against $80.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Panzura | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hybrid cloud file platform for cost reduction, simplified operations, and AI readiness. | Cloud storage provider offering affordable, high-performance, and secure object storage. |
| Category | Cloud Computing, Data Storage, Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Software | Cloud Storage, Cloud Infrastructure, Data Storage, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2008 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Jose, United States | Boston, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Panzura | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 205 | 300 |
| Total funding | $80.0M | $250M |
| Latest round | Series B | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 115 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Panzura | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Panzura | Wasabi Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Panzura vs Wasabi Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Panzura or Wasabi Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Panzura rates higher (54/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Panzura and Wasabi Technologies compare on the numbers?
Panzura leads on our overall score (54/100 against 47/100). Wasabi Technologies leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 37/100), domain rating (78/100 against 57/100), headcount (300 against 205), funding raised ($250M against $80.0M).
Read the full Panzura review and pricing or the Wasabi Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Panzura alternatives we track.