Pangea Biomed vs Ukko
Pangea Biomed vs Ukko, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Pangea Biomed is on 55/100 and Ukko on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Pangea Biomed
- headcount growth: +2.0% against -0.5%
Ukko
- our overall score: 62/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 20/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 58 against 16
- funding raised: $40.0M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 5,436 against 1,127
At a glance
| Measure | Pangea Biomed | Ukko |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Biotech company using AI and deep RNA analysis to predict cancer treatment response. | Ukko is developing novel food allergy and disorder treatments using advanced immunology and plant science. |
| Category | Healthcare, Oncology, Genomics, Biotech | Healthcare, Allergen, Immunology, Celiac |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Pangea Biomed | Ukko |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 16 | 58 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.0% | -0.5% |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,127 | 5,436 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Pangea Biomed | Ukko |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 20/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Pangea Biomed | Ukko |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Wix |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
Pangea Biomed vs Ukko: common questions
Which is better, Pangea Biomed or Ukko?
On our 0-100 score Ukko rates higher (62/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Pangea Biomed and Ukko compare on the numbers?
Pangea Biomed leads on headcount growth (+2.0% against -0.5%). Ukko leads on our overall score (62/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 39/100), domain rating (20/100 against 13/100), headcount (58 against 16), funding raised ($40.0M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (5,436 against 1,127).
Read the full Pangea Biomed review and pricing or the Ukko review and pricing. You can also browse other Pangea Biomed alternatives we track.