Panaseer vs Risk Ledger
Panaseer vs Risk Ledger, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Panaseer is on 53/100 and Risk Ledger on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Panaseer
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 38/100
- funding raised: $44.4M against $32.0M
- LinkedIn following: 12,484 against 6,713
Risk Ledger
- our overall score: 58/100 against 53/100
At a glance
| Measure | Panaseer | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Panaseer provides a Continuous Controls Monitoring platform for enterprise security, offering automated insights into cybersecurity posture. | Automates third-party risk management for enterprises through continuous monitoring and data intelligence. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Security Posture Management, Risk Management, Enterprise Security | Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Third-Party Risk Management, Supply Chain Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2014 | Not published |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Panaseer | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 91 | 91 |
| Total funding | $44.4M | $32.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,484 | 6,713 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Panaseer | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Panaseer | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
Panaseer vs Risk Ledger: common questions
Which is better, Panaseer or Risk Ledger?
On our 0-100 score Risk Ledger rates higher (58/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Panaseer and Risk Ledger compare on the numbers?
Panaseer leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 38/100), funding raised ($44.4M against $32.0M), LinkedIn following (12,484 against 6,713). Risk Ledger leads on our overall score (58/100 against 53/100).
Read the full Panaseer review and pricing or the Risk Ledger review and pricing. You can also browse other Panaseer alternatives we track.