PagerDuty vs ScaleOps
PagerDuty vs ScaleOps, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: PagerDuty is on 67/100 and ScaleOps on 63/100.
Where each one leads
PagerDuty
- our overall score: 67/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 1,274 against 149
- funding raised: $524M against $210M
- LinkedIn following: 65,851 against 18,401
ScaleOps
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | PagerDuty | ScaleOps |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform for incident management and digital operations response automation, helping teams resolve issues rapidly and improve customer experience. | ScaleOps provides an autonomous cloud and AI infrastructure platform that optimizes Kubernetes resources in real-time, reducing cloud spending by up to 80%. |
| Category | Incident Management, Digital Operations Management, AIOps, Automation | Cloud Cost Optimization, Kubernetes Optimization, AI Infrastructure, DevOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2009 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | PagerDuty | ScaleOps |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,274 | 149 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $524M | $210M |
| Latest round | Post-IPO Debt | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.3B | $800M |
| LinkedIn followers | 65,851 | 18,401 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | PagerDuty | ScaleOps |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | PagerDuty | ScaleOps |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
PagerDuty vs ScaleOps: common questions
Which is better, PagerDuty or ScaleOps?
On our 0-100 score PagerDuty rates higher (67/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do PagerDuty and ScaleOps compare on the numbers?
PagerDuty leads on our overall score (67/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 50/100), domain rating (84/100 against 62/100), headcount (1,274 against 149), funding raised ($524M against $210M), LinkedIn following (65,851 against 18,401).
Read the full PagerDuty review and pricing or the ScaleOps review and pricing. You can also browse other PagerDuty alternatives we track.