PagerDuty vs Queue-it
PagerDuty vs Queue-it, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: PagerDuty is on 67/100 and Queue-it on 53/100.
Where each one leads
PagerDuty
- our overall score: 67/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 1,274 against 184
- LinkedIn following: 65,851 against 9,108
Queue-it
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | PagerDuty | Queue-it |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform for incident management and digital operations response automation, helping teams resolve issues rapidly and improve customer experience. | Global online traffic orchestration solutions provider that helps businesses manage online traffic surges and prevent bot abuse. |
| Category | Incident Management, Digital Operations Management, AIOps, Automation | Cybersecurity, IT Operations, Online Traffic Orchestration, Virtual Waiting Room |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | PagerDuty | Queue-it |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,274 | 184 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +2.3% | Not published |
| Total funding | $524M | Not published |
| Latest round | Post-IPO Debt | Majority Equity Investment |
| Valuation | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 65,851 | 9,108 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | PagerDuty | Queue-it |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | PagerDuty | Queue-it |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
PagerDuty vs Queue-it: common questions
Which is better, PagerDuty or Queue-it?
On our 0-100 score PagerDuty rates higher (67/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do PagerDuty and Queue-it compare on the numbers?
PagerDuty leads on our overall score (67/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 51/100), headcount (1,274 against 184), LinkedIn following (65,851 against 9,108).
Read the full PagerDuty review and pricing or the Queue-it review and pricing. You can also browse other PagerDuty alternatives we track.