PACKAGE.AI vs Trigo
PACKAGE.AI vs Trigo, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: PACKAGE.AI is on 60/100 and Trigo on 62/100.
Where each one leads
PACKAGE.AI
- headcount growth: +93.2% against +0.9%
Trigo
- domain rating: 53/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 230 against 39
- funding raised: $199M against $14.0M
- LinkedIn following: 19,975 against 4,235
At a glance
| Measure | PACKAGE.AI | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered eCommerce delivery service negotiating convenient delivery windows with customers. | Computer vision startup automating retail checkout with AI-powered item identification. |
| Category | Retail, Delivery, Chatbot, Transport and Logistics | Retail, Visual Monitor, Checkout, Cashierless |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | PACKAGE.AI | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 230 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +93.2% | +0.9% |
| Total funding | $14.0M | $199M |
| Latest round | Series A | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,235 | 19,975 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | PACKAGE.AI | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 32/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | PACKAGE.AI | Trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
PACKAGE.AI vs Trigo: common questions
Which is better, PACKAGE.AI or Trigo?
On our 0-100 score Trigo rates higher (62/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do PACKAGE.AI and Trigo compare on the numbers?
PACKAGE.AI leads on headcount growth (+93.2% against +0.9%). Trigo leads on domain rating (53/100 against 32/100), headcount (230 against 39), funding raised ($199M against $14.0M), LinkedIn following (19,975 against 4,235).
Read the full PACKAGE.AI review and pricing or the Trigo review and pricing. You can also browse other PACKAGE.AI alternatives we track.