Ozone API vs Tink
Ozone API vs Tink, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ozone API is on 48/100 and Tink on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Ozone API
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 35/100
Tink
- our overall score: 67/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 57/100
- funding raised: $299M against $2.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Ozone API | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | API platform for financial institutions to securely share data and services. | European open banking platform enabling financial data access, payments, and financial service development. |
| Category | Fintech, API Platform, Open Banking, Financial Services | Fintech, Open Banking, Payments, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ozone API | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 328 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -28.1% |
| Total funding | $2.0M | $299M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 65,102 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ozone API | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 32/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 14/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ozone API | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Ozone API vs Tink: common questions
Which is better, Ozone API or Tink?
On our 0-100 score Tink rates higher (67/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ozone API and Tink compare on the numbers?
Ozone API leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 35/100). Tink leads on our overall score (67/100 against 48/100), domain rating (73/100 against 57/100), funding raised ($299M against $2.0M).
Read the full Ozone API review and pricing or the Tink review and pricing. You can also browse other Ozone API alternatives we track.