Oxford Science Enterprises vs Ultima Genomics
Oxford Science Enterprises vs Ultima Genomics, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Oxford Science Enterprises is on 47/100 and Ultima Genomics on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Oxford Science Enterprises
- funding raised: $532M against $15.0M
Ultima Genomics
- our overall score: 68/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 26/100
- domain rating: 56/100 against 48/100
At a glance
| Measure | Oxford Science Enterprises | Ultima Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Independent investment company and venture builder partnering with the University of Oxford to build businesses. | Unleashing the power of genomics at scale for biological advances and human health. |
| Category | Life Sciences, HealthTech, Deep Tech, Venture Capital | Life Sciences, Biotech, Bioinformatics, Genomics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Oxford, United Kingdom | Rehovot, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Oxford Science Enterprises | Ultima Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 298 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -1.5% |
| Total funding | $532M | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Bridge | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 29,210 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Oxford Science Enterprises | Ultima Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Oxford Science Enterprises | Ultima Genomics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Netlify |
| CDN | Vercel | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Astro |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Oxford Science Enterprises vs Ultima Genomics: common questions
Which is better, Oxford Science Enterprises or Ultima Genomics?
On our 0-100 score Ultima Genomics rates higher (68/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Oxford Science Enterprises and Ultima Genomics compare on the numbers?
Oxford Science Enterprises leads on funding raised ($532M against $15.0M). Ultima Genomics leads on our overall score (68/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (38/100 against 26/100), domain rating (56/100 against 48/100).
Read the full Oxford Science Enterprises review and pricing or the Ultima Genomics review and pricing. You can also browse other Oxford Science Enterprises alternatives we track.