Oxford Quantum Circuits vs QEDMA
Oxford Quantum Circuits vs QEDMA, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Oxford Quantum Circuits is on 55/100 and QEDMA on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Oxford Quantum Circuits
- headcount: 148 against 40
- funding raised: $430M against $40.7M
- LinkedIn following: 36,202 against 5,017
QEDMA
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 36/100
At a glance
| Measure | Oxford Quantum Circuits | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Building and deploying quantum computers. | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Deep Tech, Hardware, Cloud Computing | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Oxford, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Oxford Quantum Circuits | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 148 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +31.2% |
| Open roles | Not published | 4 |
| Total funding | $430M | $40.7M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 36,202 | 5,017 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Oxford Quantum Circuits | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 70/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Oxford Quantum Circuits | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Hotjar | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Oxford Quantum Circuits vs QEDMA: common questions
Which is better, Oxford Quantum Circuits or QEDMA?
On our 0-100 score QEDMA rates higher (56/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Oxford Quantum Circuits and QEDMA compare on the numbers?
Oxford Quantum Circuits leads on headcount (148 against 40), funding raised ($430M against $40.7M), LinkedIn following (36,202 against 5,017). QEDMA leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 36/100).
Read the full Oxford Quantum Circuits review and pricing or the QEDMA review and pricing. You can also browse other Oxford Quantum Circuits alternatives we track.