Outreach vs Phases
Outreach vs Phases, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Outreach is on 70/100 and Phases on 29/100.
Where each one leads
Outreach
- our overall score: 70/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 1,540 against 3
Phases
- agent readiness: 68/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Outreach | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for revenue teams to automate workflows, improve engagement, and drive growth. | Phases is building the first full-stack AI agent company to automate clinical trials for pharma companies, starting with patient recruitment. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Sales Engagement, Revenue Intelligence | Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Not published |
| Founded | 2014 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Outreach | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,540 | 3 |
| Total funding | $294M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series F | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 330,403 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Outreach | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 6/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 53/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | C (68/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 22/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Outreach | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Outreach | Phases |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | AI-Powered Patient Recruitment, Automated Medical Record Review, Efficient Screening Conversations, 24/7 Patient Engagement & Scalability, Seamless Integration, Cost Reduction & Trial Acceleration |
Outreach vs Phases: common questions
Which is better, Outreach or Phases?
On our 0-100 score Outreach rates higher (70/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Outreach and Phases compare on the numbers?
Outreach leads on our overall score (70/100 against 29/100), domain rating (61/100 against 22/100), headcount (1,540 against 3). Phases leads on agent readiness (68/100 against 43/100).
Read the full Outreach review and pricing or the Phases review and pricing. You can also browse other Outreach alternatives we track.