Ouster vs SiLC Technologies
Ouster vs SiLC Technologies, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ouster is on 55/100 and SiLC Technologies on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Ouster
- domain rating: 71/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 356 against 87
- funding raised: $100M against $71.0M
- LinkedIn following: 70,416 against 9,377
SiLC Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Ouster | SiLC Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Ouster is a lidar manufacturer that has acquired StereoLabs, specializing in vision-based perception systems, to create a unified sensing and perception platform for advanced physical AI systems. | Develops 4D vision systems using silicon photonics for advanced machine perception. |
| Category | Robotics, Hardware, Transportation, Industrial Automation | 4D Imaging, LIDAR, Computer Vision, Robotics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Fremont, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ouster | SiLC Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 356 | 87 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -12.2% |
| Total funding | $100M | $71.0M |
| Latest round | 12 | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 70,416 | 9,377 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ouster | SiLC Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 46/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ouster | SiLC Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Render | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Jetpack Stats |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Ouster vs SiLC Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Ouster or SiLC Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Ouster rates higher (55/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ouster and SiLC Technologies compare on the numbers?
Ouster leads on domain rating (71/100 against 46/100), headcount (356 against 87), funding raised ($100M against $71.0M), LinkedIn following (70,416 against 9,377).
Read the full Ouster review and pricing or the SiLC Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Ouster alternatives we track.