Ouster vs PxE Holographic Imaging
Ouster vs PxE Holographic Imaging, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ouster is on 55/100 and PxE Holographic Imaging on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Ouster
- our overall score: 55/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 356 against 10
- funding raised: $100M against $15.4M
- LinkedIn following: 70,416 against 516
PxE Holographic Imaging
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Ouster | PxE Holographic Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Ouster is a lidar manufacturer that has acquired StereoLabs, specializing in vision-based perception systems, to create a unified sensing and perception platform for advanced physical AI systems. | Develops a full-stack perception solution combining hardware and software for 3D imaging. |
| Category | Robotics, Hardware, Transportation, Industrial Automation | 3D, 3D Imaging, CMOS, ADAS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ouster | PxE Holographic Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 356 | 10 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +33.6% |
| Total funding | $100M | $15.4M |
| Latest round | 12 | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 70,416 | 516 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ouster | PxE Holographic Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 46/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 22/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ouster | PxE Holographic Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Render | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Ouster vs PxE Holographic Imaging: common questions
Which is better, Ouster or PxE Holographic Imaging?
On our 0-100 score Ouster rates higher (55/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ouster and PxE Holographic Imaging compare on the numbers?
Ouster leads on our overall score (55/100 against 46/100), domain rating (71/100 against 22/100), headcount (356 against 10), funding raised ($100M against $15.4M), LinkedIn following (70,416 against 516). PxE Holographic Imaging leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 43/100).
Read the full Ouster review and pricing or the PxE Holographic Imaging review and pricing. You can also browse other Ouster alternatives we track.

