Osexternal vs Pitch
Osexternal vs Pitch, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Osexternal is on 6/100 and Pitch on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Osexternal
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Pitch
- our overall score: 62/100 against 6/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 27/100
At a glance
| Measure | Osexternal | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Osexternal provides a platform for managing and automating external communication and workflows. | Collaborative pitch deck and presentation software for modern teams. |
| Category | Workflow Automation, Customer Relationship Management, Business Process Management, Collaboration Tools | Presentation Software, Collaboration Tools, Productivity Software, Sales Enablement |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Osexternal | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 74 |
| Total funding | Not published | $73.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 37,679 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Osexternal | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 6/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (27/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Osexternal | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Osexternal vs Pitch: common questions
Which is better, Osexternal or Pitch?
On our 0-100 score Pitch rates higher (62/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Osexternal and Pitch compare on the numbers?
Pitch leads on our overall score (62/100 against 6/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 27/100).
Read the full Osexternal review and pricing or the Pitch review and pricing. You can also browse other Osexternal alternatives we track.