Ortivity vs Spring Health
Ortivity vs Spring Health, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ortivity is on 32/100 and Spring Health on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Ortivity
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Spring Health
- our overall score: 68/100 against 32/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 3,761 against 35
- funding raised: $467M against $216M
- LinkedIn following: 260,707 against 1,072
At a glance
| Measure | Ortivity | Spring Health |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A German HealthTech startup focused on integrated outpatient orthopaedic care. | Digital mental healthcare platform for employers and health plans, focusing on fast, precise care matching. |
| Category | HealthTech, Clinics/Outpatient Services, Orthopaedic Care, Digital Health | HealthTech, Mental Health Tech, Telemedicine, Employee Benefits |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Munich, Germany | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ortivity | Spring Health |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 35 | 3,761 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +17.7% |
| Total funding | $216M | $467M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,072 | 260,707 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ortivity | Spring Health |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 32/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 35/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ortivity | Spring Health |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Mixpanel |
Ortivity vs Spring Health: common questions
Which is better, Ortivity or Spring Health?
On our 0-100 score Spring Health rates higher (68/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ortivity and Spring Health compare on the numbers?
Spring Health leads on our overall score (68/100 against 32/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), domain rating (73/100 against 35/100), headcount (3,761 against 35), funding raised ($467M against $216M), LinkedIn following (260,707 against 1,072).
Read the full Ortivity review and pricing or the Spring Health review and pricing. You can also browse other Ortivity alternatives we track.