Oratomic vs Q-Factor
Oratomic vs Q-Factor, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Oratomic is on 55/100 and Q-Factor on 43/100.
Where each one leads
Oratomic
- our overall score: 55/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 2/100
- funding raised: $300M against $24.0M
Q-Factor
- LinkedIn following: 1,182 against 288
At a glance
| Measure | Oratomic | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing neutral-atom quantum hardware and fault-tolerant architectures to accelerate quantum computing. | Q-Factor is a quantum computing startup developing a neutral atom-based quantum computer architecture designed to scale to one million qubits and beyond. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Hardware, Deep Tech, Quantum Hardware | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, Microelectronics & Photonics Solutions, Deep Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2023 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | South Pasadena, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Oratomic | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 13 |
| Total funding | $300M | $24.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 288 | 1,182 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Oratomic | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 50/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Oratomic | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Lovable |
| Frameworks | Sveltekit, Svelte, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Oratomic vs Q-Factor: common questions
Which is better, Oratomic or Q-Factor?
On our 0-100 score Oratomic rates higher (55/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Oratomic and Q-Factor compare on the numbers?
Oratomic leads on our overall score (55/100 against 43/100), domain rating (36/100 against 2/100), funding raised ($300M against $24.0M). Q-Factor leads on LinkedIn following (1,182 against 288).
Read the full Oratomic review and pricing or the Q-Factor review and pricing. You can also browse other Oratomic alternatives we track.