OQC vs QEDMA
OQC vs QEDMA, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: OQC is on 54/100 and QEDMA on 56/100.
Where each one leads
OQC
- funding raised: $378M against $40.7M
QEDMA
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 52/100 against 0/100
At a glance
| Measure | OQC | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quantum computing company developing superconducting quantum chips. | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Semiconductors | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Abingdon, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | OQC | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +31.2% |
| Open roles | Not published | 4 |
| Total funding | $378M | $40.7M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5,017 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | OQC | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | OQC | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Linode | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
What users say
| Measure | OQC | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“OQC integrated Purcell filters into multilayer PCB packaging, a first, using 10 GHz bandpass triangular coplanar patch antennas supporting 9-channel multiplexed readout on a 35-qubit chip, boosting coherence without increasing processor foo”r/informaq
OQC vs QEDMA: common questions
Which is better, OQC or QEDMA?
On our 0-100 score QEDMA rates higher (56/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do OQC and QEDMA compare on the numbers?
OQC leads on funding raised ($378M against $40.7M). QEDMA leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 21/100), domain rating (52/100 against 0/100).
What do real users say about OQC and QEDMA?
OQC: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/informaq.
Read the full OQC review and pricing or the QEDMA review and pricing. You can also browse other OQC alternatives we track.