OQC vs PsiQuantum
OQC vs PsiQuantum, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: OQC is on 54/100 and PsiQuantum on 70/100.
Where each one leads
OQC
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
PsiQuantum
- our overall score: 70/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 63/100 against 0/100
- funding raised: $3.6B against $378M
At a glance
| Measure | OQC | PsiQuantum |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quantum computing company developing superconducting quantum chips. | Building a fault-tolerant quantum computer using photonics and silicon manufacturing. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Semiconductors | Quantum Computing, AI Chip, AI Hardware, Semiconductor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Abingdon, United Kingdom | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | OQC | PsiQuantum |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 632 |
| Total funding | $378M | $3.6B |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 81,923 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | OQC | PsiQuantum |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 37/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | OQC | PsiQuantum |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Linode | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Squarespace |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | OQC | PsiQuantum |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“OQC integrated Purcell filters into multilayer PCB packaging, a first, using 10 GHz bandpass triangular coplanar patch antennas supporting 9-channel multiplexed readout on a 35-qubit chip, boosting coherence without increasing processor foo”r/informaq
OQC vs PsiQuantum: common questions
Which is better, OQC or PsiQuantum?
On our 0-100 score PsiQuantum rates higher (70/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do OQC and PsiQuantum compare on the numbers?
PsiQuantum leads on our overall score (70/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 21/100), domain rating (63/100 against 0/100), funding raised ($3.6B against $378M).
What do real users say about OQC and PsiQuantum?
OQC: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/informaq.
Read the full OQC review and pricing or the PsiQuantum review and pricing. You can also browse other OQC alternatives we track.