OQC vs Oxford Ionics
OQC vs Oxford Ionics, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: OQC is on 54/100 and Oxford Ionics on 48/100.
Where each one leads
OQC
- our overall score: 54/100 against 48/100
- funding raised: $378M against $63.0M
Oxford Ionics
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | OQC | Oxford Ionics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quantum computing company developing superconducting quantum chips. | Quantum computing research and development |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Semiconductors | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Abingdon, United Kingdom | Oxford, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | OQC | Oxford Ionics |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $378M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | OQC | Oxford Ionics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 39/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | OQC | Oxford Ionics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Linode | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | OQC | Oxford Ionics |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“OQC integrated Purcell filters into multilayer PCB packaging, a first, using 10 GHz bandpass triangular coplanar patch antennas supporting 9-channel multiplexed readout on a 35-qubit chip, boosting coherence without increasing processor foo”r/informaq
OQC vs Oxford Ionics: common questions
Which is better, OQC or Oxford Ionics?
On our 0-100 score OQC rates higher (54/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do OQC and Oxford Ionics compare on the numbers?
OQC leads on our overall score (54/100 against 48/100), funding raised ($378M against $63.0M).
What do real users say about OQC and Oxford Ionics?
OQC: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/informaq.
Read the full OQC review and pricing or the Oxford Ionics review and pricing. You can also browse other OQC alternatives we track.