OpusClip vs Working Progress
OpusClip vs Working Progress, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: OpusClip is on 70/100 and Working Progress on 26/100.
Where each one leads
OpusClip
- our overall score: 70/100 against 26/100
- agent readiness: 67/100 against 50/100
Working Progress
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | OpusClip | Working Progress |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered video repurposing tool that transforms long-form videos into viral short clips for social media. | An animation studio that creates short animations, visual explainers, and narrative films for mission-driven organizations. |
| Category | Video Editing Software, Content Creation, Social Media Marketing, Video Repurposing | Animation Studio, Video Production, Content Creation, Digital Storytelling |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C, B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Sheffield, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | OpusClip | Working Progress |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 146 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +26.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $76.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 29,596 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | OpusClip | Working Progress |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 26/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 78/100 | 42/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (67/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | OpusClip | Working Progress |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Nuxt |
| Payments | Stripe | Not detected |
| Analytics | Mixpanel | Google Tag Manager |
Product and pricing
| Measure | OpusClip | Working Progress |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | ClipAnything, AI Reframe, AI B-Roll Generator, Animated Captions, Social Scheduler, Team Workspace | Not published |
| Current offer | 50% off | Not published |
OpusClip vs Working Progress: common questions
Which is better, OpusClip or Working Progress?
On our 0-100 score OpusClip rates higher (70/100 against 26/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do OpusClip and Working Progress compare on the numbers?
OpusClip leads on our overall score (70/100 against 26/100), agent readiness (67/100 against 50/100).
Read the full OpusClip review and pricing or the Working Progress review and pricing. You can also browse other OpusClip alternatives we track.