Optoplex vs Quantum Machines
Optoplex vs Quantum Machines, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Optoplex is on 50/100 and Quantum Machines on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Optoplex
- agent readiness: 32/100 against 25/100
Quantum Machines
- our overall score: 68/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 54/100 against 19/100
- headcount: 302 against 201
- funding raised: $293M against $6.0M
- LinkedIn following: 31,433 against 434
At a glance
| Measure | Optoplex | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Designs, develops, and manufactures high-performance fiber-optic components for dynamic wavelength management and signal conditioning. | Builds the Quantum Orchestration Platform (QOP) to accelerate quantum computing development and deployment. |
| Category | Photonic Components, Fiber Optics, Telecommunications, Optical Networking | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Software, AI Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2000 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Fremont, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Optoplex | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 201 | 302 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +27.4% |
| Total funding | $6.0M | $293M |
| Latest round | Early Stage VC | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $700M |
| LinkedIn followers | 434 | 31,433 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Optoplex | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 29/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Optoplex | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Optoplex vs Quantum Machines: common questions
Which is better, Optoplex or Quantum Machines?
On our 0-100 score Quantum Machines rates higher (68/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Optoplex and Quantum Machines compare on the numbers?
Optoplex leads on agent readiness (32/100 against 25/100). Quantum Machines leads on our overall score (68/100 against 50/100), domain rating (54/100 against 19/100), headcount (302 against 201), funding raised ($293M against $6.0M), LinkedIn following (31,433 against 434).
Read the full Optoplex review and pricing or the Quantum Machines review and pricing. You can also browse other Optoplex alternatives we track.